In the Philippines, several studies have examined the role and impact of calculator usage among students. Local research delves into how calculator dependency affects students’ learning processes and their overall mathematical proficiency. These studies come from various academic perspectives and investigate the nuanced effects of technology integration into educational settings.
Local studies showcase a spectrum of outcomes regarding calculator dependency. Some research indicates that the integration of calculators in the classroom has enhanced problem-solving skills when used appropriately. However, other studies warn about an over-dependence on these devices, which can lead to a weakening of basic arithmetic and computational abilities.
A study conducted by De Sagun (1992) on high school freshmen in Manila investigated the effects of calculator usage on computational skills. It found that when calculators were used alongside mental arithmetic, students exhibited improved performance compared to traditional paper-and-pencil methods. This study suggested that the use of calculators, when integrated thoughtfully into lessons, could be beneficial rather than detrimental.
Another significant study by Dionio (1993) focused on students' attitudes towards mathematics in the context of calculator use. This research revealed that there was no notable difference in the students’ attitudes whether they used calculators or not, indicating that technology in itself did not adversely alter the learning environment. Instead, it was the manner and frequency of usage that brought about any concerns relating to dependency.
More recent research, such as the study by Beros et al. (2024) among Grade 10 students in Bulacan, found a significant negative correlation between extensive calculator usage and the students’ perceived proficiency in fundamental mathematical skills. This study has spurred further discussion among educators about the necessity to balance technological aids with traditional learning methods to foster strong computational fundamentals.
International research on calculator dependency offers complementary insights to the local studies. These studies generally embrace a global perspective in understanding the benefits of calculator use while also highlighting the risks associated with an over-reliance on technological aids in mathematics education.
Foreign studies have investigated a wide range of issues from the academic performance of students to the curriculum design intended to manage technology usage effectively. In the United States, a study by Karpie (2013) examined the dependency on calculators for handling exponents, concluding that although students showed slight improvement in performance with calculator assistance, the difference did not substantiate a high level of dependency. This finding has been used to argue for selective and strategic integration of calculators in learning environments.
Another noteworthy study by Goos and Bennison (2008) in Australia highlighted the challenges in integrating modern technological tools like calculators in classrooms, particularly due to limited access to supplementary resources such as computer labs. Their research advocates for a balance between using technology and maintaining emphases on fundamental arithmetic practices to ensure students develop a robust sense of number operations and problem-solving ability.
A comprehensive analysis by Geisweit (2018) discusses evolving debates surrounding calculator dependency. In this study, the discussion centers on how continual reliance on calculators may cause students to lose a natural number sense, with educators pointing out that over-dependency could stunt the development of mental calculation skills. Such insights have led to recommendations from advisory bodies like the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) to carefully structure technology use in lessons to preserve core mathematical competencies.
Aspect | Local Studies (Philippines) | Foreign Studies |
---|---|---|
Focus |
|
|
Key Findings |
|
|
Recommendations |
|
|
In the Philippine educational framework, the expanding integration of calculators in the learning process is a subject of intense study. Research conducted across various schools has illuminated contrasting views regarding calculator usage. For instance, while initial studies from the early 1990s reported potential benefits in combining calculator use with mental arithmetic exercises, more contemporary research seems to present growing concerns. Educators in the Philippines are noticing that frequent reliance on calculators may lead to a gradual decline in students' abilities to perform basic calculations manually.
This trend is particularly crucial in light of a study conducted among Grade 10 students in Bulacan, which revealed that higher dependency on calculators could result in a lowered self-assessment of mathematical skills. The study emphasizes that while calculators assist in problem-solving, over-dependency may prevent students from developing the mental flexibility needed to calculate quickly and accurately without technological aids.
Local educators have been deliberating on the optimal way to utilize calculators without compromising essential mental arithmetic skills. The idea is not to eliminate the technology but to incorporate it as a supplemental tool that enhances understanding rather than replaces fundamental computation practices. For instance, the research by De Sagun (1992) supports balanced integration, suggesting that when calculators are used as an adjunct to traditional methods, students can benefit from advanced computational tools without a loss in basic skill development.
International studies provide a broader viewpoint that aligns with and extends the findings of local research. In the United States, research such as that by Karpie (2013) has found that while calculators can improve performance in handling complex calculations, they do not substitute for a well-developed sense of numerical intuition. This indicates that students may perform marginally better with calculators during examinations involving multistep problems, but the improvement is not dramatic enough to overlook the importance of practicing manual computations.
A study in Australia further underscores the importance of maintaining traditional computational methods. Goos and Bennison (2008) argue that while technology in classrooms is inevitable, its application must be judiciously balanced to avoid inadvertently reducing students’ mastery over basic arithmetic skills. The integration of calculators should aim to enhance, rather than replace, the essential cognitive work required in learning mathematics.
Researchers globally suggest several strategies to strike a balance between technological aid and manual computation:
These approaches not only reinforce the basic mathematical skills of students but also prepare them for situations where quick mental computation is critical. The overarching recommendation from foreign studies is that educators need to view calculators as complementary tools that enhance learning rather than as substitutes for rigorous mathematical training.
Both local and foreign literature acknowledge that calculators have a role in modern classrooms. However, the challenge lies in integrating these devices without compromising overall mathematical competence. The consensus among researchers is that there should be well-defined policies concerning when and how calculators may be used during instruction and assessment. This includes guidelines such as:
In designing curricula, educational policymakers in the Philippines and abroad propose the integration of technology as a bridge rather than a crutch. The following policies are often recommended:
Such initiatives are designed to preserve the critical cognitive skills that form the backbone of effective mathematical reasoning. Educators are encouraged to foster a learning environment where calculators serve as aids that bolster learning, rather than act as oversimplified shortcuts.
Research | Local (Philippines) | Foreign |
---|---|---|
Study Focus |
|
|
Findings |
|
|
Key References |
|
|