Comprehensive CPU Benchmark Comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25+, Galaxy S24 FE, and iPhone 16 Pro
Analyzing the performance metrics and architectural strengths of the latest flagship smartphones
Key Takeaways
- Single-Core Dominance: The iPhone 16 Pro leads in single-core performance, ensuring superior performance in applications that rely on single-threaded processes.
- Multi-Core Excellence: Samsung Galaxy S25+ outperforms its competitors in multi-core benchmarks, making it ideal for multitasking and demanding applications.
- Value-Oriented Performance: The Galaxy S24 FE offers respectable CPU performance for everyday tasks, positioning itself as a cost-effective alternative within the Samsung lineup.
Introduction
The smartphone market continually evolves, with manufacturers striving to outdo each other in terms of performance, efficiency, and user experience. Central to this competition are the Central Processing Units (CPUs) that power these devices. This comprehensive comparison delves into the CPU benchmarks of three flagship smartphones: the Samsung Galaxy S25+, Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, and Apple iPhone 16 Pro. By analyzing their performance metrics, architectural designs, and real-world usability, this report aims to provide an in-depth understanding of which device stands out in the realm of processing power.
Detailed Benchmark Analysis
Geekbench 6 Performance Scores
Single-Core Performance
Single-core performance is a critical indicator of a device's ability to handle tasks that rely heavily on a single processor core. This metric is paramount for applications such as web browsing, gaming, and everyday multitasking.
| Device | Geekbench 6 Single-Core Score |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | ~3,160 |
| iPhone 16 Pro | ~3,400 |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | ~2,035 |
As depicted in the table above, the iPhone 16 Pro leads in single-core performance with a score of approximately 3,400. This superior performance ensures that the device can efficiently handle single-threaded applications, leading to smoother user experiences in tasks that depend on rapid processing speeds.
Multi-Core Performance
Multi-core performance assesses a device's ability to manage and execute multiple processes simultaneously. This is particularly important for multitasking, video editing, and running complex applications that utilize multiple threads.
| Device | Geekbench 6 Multi-Core Score |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | ~9,941 |
| iPhone 16 Pro | ~8,341 |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | ~5,979 |
In terms of multi-core performance, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ stands out with a score nearing 10,000, indicating robust capabilities in handling intensive multitasking scenarios. The iPhone 16 Pro follows with a strong score of approximately 8,341, while the Galaxy S24 FE, designed as a more budget-friendly option, achieves a respectable score of around 5,979, suitable for everyday tasks.
CPU Architecture and Chipset Analysis
Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Galaxy S25+ is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, manufactured using a 3nm process. Its CPU architecture comprises two Prime cores that clock at up to 4.47 GHz and six Performance cores running at 3.53 GHz. This configuration ensures a balanced performance profile, delivering high-speed processing for demanding tasks while maintaining energy efficiency.
iPhone 16 Pro
Apple's iPhone 16 Pro features the custom-designed Apple A18 Pro chipset. This CPU consists of a 6-core architecture, emphasizing both performance and efficiency. The A18 Pro is renowned for its optimized integration with iOS, allowing for seamless performance even in resource-intensive applications. The higher single-core score underscores Apple's focus on maximizing per-core performance.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
The Galaxy S24 FE utilizes the Exynos 2400e chipset, a 10-core processor designed to offer a balance between performance and power consumption. While specific clock speeds are not detailed, the CPU is expected to provide sufficient power for daily operations and moderate multitasking without the higher benchmark scores seen in the S25+ or iPhone 16 Pro.
Real-World Performance and Efficiency
Single-Core Efficiency
Single-core efficiency is crucial for tasks that do not effectively utilize multiple cores. The iPhone 16 Pro's leading single-core score ensures swift app launches, smoother interactions, and better performance in applications optimized for single-threaded processes. In contrast, while the Galaxy S25+ also offers high single-core performance, it slightly trails behind the iPhone 16 Pro, making the latter a superior choice for users prioritizing single-threaded application performance.
Multi-Core Handling
For multi-threaded tasks, such as gaming, video rendering, and heavy multitasking, the Galaxy S25+'s superior multi-core performance provides a significant advantage. This higher score translates to better handling of complex applications and smoother performance when multiple apps are running simultaneously. The iPhone 16 Pro, while strong in this area, does not match the Galaxy S25+'s multi-core prowess, offering a more balanced performance profile.
Thermal Management and Battery Efficiency
Thermal management is a critical aspect of CPU performance, especially under sustained loads. The Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Galaxy S25+ is designed with advanced thermal solutions to maintain performance without overheating, ensuring consistent performance during extended use. The A18 Pro in the iPhone 16 Pro benefits from Apple's tightly integrated hardware-software ecosystem, optimizing power usage and maintaining efficiency. The Galaxy S24 FE, being a more budget-oriented device, balances performance with battery life, making it suitable for users with moderate usage patterns.
Comparative Benchmarks Visualization
Benchmark Scores at a Glance
| Device | Single-Core (Geekbench 6) | Multi-Core (Geekbench 6) | Chipset |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | ~3,160 | ~9,941 | Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) |
| iPhone 16 Pro | ~3,400 | ~8,341 | Apple A18 Pro |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | ~2,035 | ~5,979 | Exynos 2400e (10-core) |
Interpretation of Scores
The table above provides a clear comparison of the Geekbench 6 scores across the three devices. The iPhone 16 Pro's single-core score surpasses both Samsung devices, highlighting its strength in tasks that depend on fast single-threaded performance. However, in multi-core scores, the Galaxy S25+ outpaces the iPhone 16 Pro, making it a better choice for applications that can leverage multiple cores for enhanced performance.
Architectural Insights
Chipset Architecture and Manufacturing Process
Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro
The Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, offers a modern and efficient architecture that balances performance and power consumption. Its dual Prime cores and six Performance cores are designed to handle a wide range of tasks efficiently. On the other hand, Apple's A18 Pro leverages a custom-designed architecture optimized for iOS, providing exceptional single-core performance and tight integration with the operating system, which can lead to optimized real-world performance beyond what benchmark scores might suggest.
Exynos 2400e in Galaxy S24 FE
The Exynos 2400e, featuring a 10-core configuration, is tailored to deliver adequate performance for the Galaxy S24 FE's target audience. While it doesn't match the raw benchmark scores of its counterparts, it offers a balanced performance for everyday tasks, ensuring that the device remains efficient and responsive without the premium power consumption of higher-end chipsets.
Impact of CPU Architecture on User Experience
A well-designed CPU architecture doesn't just translate to higher benchmark scores; it also impacts the overall user experience. Apple's focus on single-core performance ensures that day-to-day tasks feel snappier, enhancing the perceived speed of the device. Samsung's emphasis on multi-core performance caters to users who engage in more intensive tasks, such as gaming, video editing, and heavy multitasking, providing a smoother and more efficient experience in these scenarios.
Real-World Performance and Use Cases
Gaming Performance
For mobile gamers, CPU performance plays a crucial role in rendering graphics smoothly and maintaining high frame rates. The iPhone 16 Pro's superior single-core performance ensures that games optimized for single-threaded operations run smoothly. However, the Galaxy S25+'s strong multi-core performance provides an edge in games that can leverage multiple threads for enhanced graphics and faster processing, offering a more immersive gaming experience in titles that support multi-threading.
Multitasking and Productivity
Users who frequently multitask or use productivity applications will benefit from higher multi-core performance. The Galaxy S25+ excels in this area, handling multiple applications and background processes with ease due to its robust multi-core architecture. While the iPhone 16 Pro also offers commendable multitasking capabilities, the Galaxy S25+'s higher multi-core score makes it more adept at managing heavy workloads and complex tasks simultaneously.
Everyday Usage
For everyday tasks such as browsing, social media, and media consumption, single-core performance is more indicative of user experience. The iPhone 16 Pro's leading single-core performance ensures that these tasks are handled swiftly and efficiently, leading to a more responsive and fluid user interface. The Galaxy S24 FE, while not leading in benchmarks, still provides adequate performance for these tasks, making it a viable option for users with standard usage patterns.
Efficiency and Thermal Management
Battery Life Considerations
CPU efficiency directly impacts battery life, as more efficient processors consume less power during operation. The Snapdragon 8 Elite's 3nm architecture offers improved power efficiency, contributing to longer battery life even under heavy usage. Apple's A18 Pro, with its optimized integration with iOS, ensures that power consumption is managed effectively, extending the device's uptime. The Exynos 2400e in the Galaxy S24 FE, while less powerful, maintains a balance between performance and battery efficiency, suitable for users who prioritize longer battery life over peak performance.
Thermal Performance
Heat generation is a byproduct of high performance, and effective thermal management is essential to maintain performance consistency. The Galaxy S25+'s Snapdragon 8 Elite is engineered with advanced cooling solutions to dissipate heat efficiently, ensuring sustained performance during extended use. The iPhone 16 Pro also benefits from Apple's refined thermal design, preventing thermal throttling and maintaining optimal performance levels. The Galaxy S24 FE, designed for balanced performance, typically generates less heat, contributing to a cooler and more comfortable device during prolonged usage.
Software Optimization and Ecosystem Integration
iOS vs. Android Optimization
Apple's iOS is renowned for its tight integration with hardware, allowing for seamless performance optimizations that leverage the A18 Pro's architecture effectively. This synergy ensures that applications run smoothly, benefiting from both hardware capabilities and software efficiencies. Samsung's Android-based devices benefit from versatility and customization, with the Galaxy S25+'s Snapdragon 8 Elite being optimized for high performance in a wide range of applications and use cases. The Galaxy S24 FE, while running on Android, emphasizes user-friendly performance for mainstream tasks without the need for high customization.
Consistency Across Applications
Benchmark scores provide a snapshot of potential performance, but real-world application performance can vary based on software optimization. Apple's consistent performance across applications is a testament to its optimized ecosystem, ensuring that both Apple and third-party developers can harness the full potential of the A18 Pro. Samsung's Galaxy S25+ offers flexibility across various applications and services, balancing high performance with the need for consistency across diverse software environments. The Galaxy S24 FE, while less powerful, maintains reliability and stability in common applications, ensuring a smooth user experience without performance hiccups.
Cost vs. Performance
Premium vs. Value Offerings
The Galaxy S25+ positions itself as Samsung's premium offering, with top-tier CPU performance reflected in its higher benchmark scores. This makes it a compelling choice for users who demand the highest performance levels for gaming, multitasking, and professional applications. The iPhone 16 Pro, while slightly trailing in multi-core benchmarks, offers exceptional single-core performance and the benefits of the Apple ecosystem, making it ideal for users deeply integrated into iOS. The Galaxy S24 FE serves as a more affordable option, delivering adequate performance for everyday tasks without the premium cost associated with higher-end models.
Return on Investment
Investing in a device with higher benchmark scores can translate to better longevity and performance over time, especially as applications become more demanding. The Galaxy S25+'s superior multi-core performance ensures it remains capable of handling future software updates and applications that leverage multiple cores. The iPhone 16 Pro's robust single-core performance ensures continued smooth operation of iOS applications, offering sustained usability. The Galaxy S24 FE, while not leading in benchmarks, provides a cost-effective solution for users who prioritize value without compromising on essential performance needs.
Conclusion
When comparing the CPU benchmarks of the Samsung Galaxy S25+, Galaxy S24 FE, and iPhone 16 Pro, each device offers distinct advantages tailored to different user needs. The iPhone 16 Pro excels in single-core performance, delivering swift and responsive experiences for tasks that rely on single-threaded processing. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ dominates in multi-core performance, making it the preferred choice for users engaging in multitasking, gaming, and resource-intensive applications. The Galaxy S24 FE, while positioning itself as a value-oriented device, provides sufficient performance for everyday tasks, catering to a broader audience seeking affordability without significant compromises in performance.
Ultimately, the choice between these devices should be guided by individual usage patterns and performance priorities. Whether it’s leveraging the seamless efficiency of the iPhone 16 Pro, harnessing the multi-core prowess of the Galaxy S25+, or opting for the balanced performance of the Galaxy S24 FE, each smartphone offers a unique proposition in the competitive landscape of modern mobile technology.
References
Last updated February 15, 2025