IFRS 18, titled "Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements," is a new accounting standard issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on April 9, 2024. This standard is set to become effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027, although early adoption is permitted. By replacing IAS 1, which set out the original framework for presenting financial statements, IFRS 18 marks a significant advance in enhancing the way entities report their financial performance.
The primary goal of IFRS 18 is to improve the comparability and transparency of financial reporting. This is achieved by establishing a well-defined structure for the statement of profit or loss, ensuring that essential subtotals and classifications are consistently presented across different companies. Stakeholders, particularly investors, benefit from this improved clarity, as it enables them to assess performance more effectively and make better-informed comparisons.
IFRS 18 introduces a systematic approach to classifying and disclosing items in the financial statements. Depending on interpretations in various sectors and regional practices, the standard requires entities to group income and expenses distinctly—typically into categories such as operating, investing, financing, income taxes, and discontinued operations, or sometimes consolidated into three primary categories as noted in some interpretations (operating, investing, and financing).
One of the core changes under IFRS 18 is the requirement for specific subtotals in the income statement. These include:
Beyond the restructuring of classifications, IFRS 18 emphasizes enhanced transparency in financial disclosures. It mandates detailed explanations in relation to the aggregation and disaggregation of financial information. This means that companies must provide clear rationale for combining certain items or breaking them down, ensuring that no material information is obscured by excessive aggregation or non-transparent presentation.
This improved disclosure framework is designed to assist investors and other stakeholders in understanding the underlying performance and financial dynamics of an entity. Adequate disclosure also extends to management-defined performance measures (MPMs) where applicable, including explanations of how these measures correlate with the required IFRS subtotals.
The standard not only prescribes a new format for the presentation of financial statements but also sets out guidelines for its retrospective application. IFRS 18 is intended to be applied to comparative figures, meaning that for companies transitioning from IAS 1, previous financial statements must be restated in accordance with the new standard. This consistency ensures that comparisons across multiple reporting periods remain meaningful.
Furthermore, while the effective date is January 1, 2027, the option for early adoption provides companies with flexibility to implement the standard sooner if they wish to reap the benefits of enhanced clarity and reporting consistency.
Aspect | Under IAS 1 | Under IFRS 18 |
---|---|---|
Overall Objective | Consistent presentation of financial statements | Enhanced transparency and comparability with clearer categories and subtotals |
Key Reporting Categories | Varied presentation formats | Structured classifications (operating, investing, financing [and sometimes others]) |
Mandatory Subtotals | Limited or non-mandatory subtotals | Inclusion of 'Operating profit or loss' and 'Profit before financing and income taxes' |
Application Method | Applied prospectively with some exceptions | Retrospective application for comparative purposes |
Disclosure Enhancements | General disclosure requirements | More detailed aggregation/disaggregation guidance and disclosure requirements in line with management-defined performance measures |
One of the main target groups for IFRS 18 is investors. The clear disaggregation of revenue and expense items, along with mandatory subtotals, facilitates a greater understanding of an entity’s core operational performance. Analysts can more effectively compare financial performance across companies since the standardized layout reduces the diversity in presentation. This heightened clarity supports better forecasting of future cash flows and more accurate valuation models.
For management and those who prepare the financial statements, IFRS 18 implies a more disciplined approach in reporting. The standard mandates a more structured format, which may require adjustments in existing reporting systems and processes. Although this change can entail initial expenses in system upgrades and staff retraining, the long-term benefit lies in enhanced internal transparency, which can support better decision making.
Regulators benefit from IFRS 18 through a clearer framework for assessing the compliance and financial reporting practices of entities. This enhanced clarity promotes a higher baseline for accountability and consistency across reporting jurisdictions.
When an entity transitions from IAS 1 to IFRS 18, it must apply the standard retrospectively. This means that comparative figures presented in financial reports must be restated under the new requirements. The transition process involves:
IFRS 18’s requirements are expected to lead to more meaningful performance metrics. The emphasis on core operational results through specific subtotals allows stakeholders to isolate the effects of financing and tax measures from the core business performance. This stratification helps in:
IFRS 18 effectively carries forward many of the principles of IAS 1 while addressing historical criticisms of excessive aggregation and lack of transparency in the presentation of financial figures. By building on the well-established framework of IAS 1, IFRS 18 allows for continuity, yet it introduces enough change to significantly improve the depth and clarity of financial reporting.
While the overall structure of IFRS 18 is applicable across all industries, companies operating in sectors with complex financial instruments or significant non-operational income may find the new structure particularly beneficial. The enhanced disclosure requirements ensure that any sector-specific nuances are transparently detailed, allowing stakeholders to understand the unique challenges or practices within that industry.