Longsword fencing, a cornerstone of Historical European Martial Arts (HEMA), is built upon a sophisticated system of guards or stances. These are not merely static poses but dynamic positions that form the beginning, middle, and end of all offensive and defensive actions. Understanding these guards is crucial for any practitioner seeking to grasp the art of the longsword. This guide provides a comprehensive rundown of the principal guards found in the major historical traditions, primarily German and Italian, detailing their characteristics, tactical applications, and significance in combat.
The German school of longsword fencing, heavily influenced by Johannes Liechtenauer and later masters like Joachim Meyer, emphasizes four primary guards known as the "Vier Leger" (Four Guards). These are considered foundational, with many other positions being variations or transitional movements.
A fencer adopting a ready stance, exemplifying the poised and dynamic nature of longsword guards.
Position: The sword is held high, typically above the head or resting on the shoulder (often the right shoulder for a right-handed fencer), with the point angled upwards or slightly back. The left foot is often forward.
Purpose: This is an aggressive guard, poised for powerful descending cuts (like the Oberhau or Scheitelhau). It can also be used to invite an attack to a seemingly open line, only to counter swiftly. It offers excellent offensive potential and can transition into thrusts.
Tactical Notes: While appearing open, Vom Tag allows the fencer to command the high line and initiate attacks with gravity's aid. It's a versatile starting or reset position.
Position: The sword hilt is held to the side and typically above head height (e.g., on the left side if the right foot is forward), with the arms curled so the point is directed towards the opponent's face or chest, like an ox's horn. The long edge often faces upwards or outwards.
Purpose: Ochs is strong for defending against attacks from above and allows for quick, well-aimed thrusts. It controls the upper lines and can be used to bind and wind against the opponent's blade.
Tactical Notes: This guard provides good cover for the head and upper body while maintaining a direct threat to the opponent. It's effective for close-range engagements.
Position: The sword hilt is held low, typically near the hip on the side of the back foot (e.g., left hip if the right foot is forward), with the point angled upwards towards the opponent's face or chest. The long edge usually faces downwards.
Purpose: Pflug is a robust defensive guard, excellent for parrying attacks and delivering quick counter-thrusts or rising cuts from below. It covers the lower and middle lines effectively.
Tactical Notes: This guard offers a stable base for both defense and offense, allowing for strong leverage in the bind and quick transitions to other actions.
Position: The sword is held low, with the point directed towards the ground, often slightly forward. It can appear to leave the fencer vulnerable.
Purpose: Alber is a deceptive guard designed to bait an opponent into attacking a perceived opening. From Alber, the fencer can execute swift counter-attacks, often thrusts (like Langenort) or rising cuts.
Tactical Notes: Its "foolish" appearance is its strength, inviting predictable attacks that can be exploited. It's excellent for controlling distance and setting traps.
Beyond the Vier Leger, other positions are recognized:
The Italian school of longsword, notably documented by Fiore dei Liberi in his "Fior di Battaglia" (Flower of Battle, c. 1409), presents a system often based around twelve primary guards or "Poste." These guards are also dynamic and serve as entry and exit points for techniques.
Fiore categorizes his guards, some having multiple variations (e.g., stable, instable, front or rear-weighted).
Other guards mentioned by Fiore include Posta di Bicorno (Two-Horned Guard) and transitional postures. Like the German system, these are not static but points in a continuous flow of motion.
The following radar chart offers a conceptual comparison of some prominent German and Italian longsword guards across several tactical attributes. These are generalized assessments, as the effectiveness of any guard can vary based on the fencer, opponent, and specific situation.
This chart illustrates that guards like Vom Tag and Posta di Donna excel in offensive power, while Pflug offers superior defensive stability. Alber stands out for its deception potential, and Posta Longa for reach. All guards require fluidity for effective transitions.
Regardless of tradition, longsword guards serve several crucial tactical functions:
Mastery involves not just knowing the guards but understanding their interplay, the appropriate moments to use them, and how to transition seamlessly between them in response to an opponent's actions.
This mindmap provides a visual overview of the primary longsword guard traditions and their core components, illustrating the structured yet interconnected nature of these foundational fencing postures.
The mindmap highlights the two major historical schools—German and Italian—and lists some of their most characteristic guards. While distinct, some guards share functional similarities across traditions, reflecting common biomechanical and tactical principles of sword fighting.
The following table summarizes key information for some of the most prominent guards from both German and Italian traditions, offering a quick reference for their positioning and primary purpose.
Guard Name | Tradition | General Position | Primary Purpose(s) | Tactical Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vom Tag | German | High (over shoulder/head) | Powerful downward/diagonal cuts, offense | Aggressive, can invite attacks |
Ochs | German | High (hilt by head, point forward) | Thrusts to face/chest, upper line defense | Strong for binding, close control |
Pflug | German | Low (hilt by hip, point up) | Low/mid line defense, upward thrusts/cuts | Stable, good for counter-attacks |
Alber | German | Low (point down) | Baiting opponent, deceptive counters | Invites attack to exploit openings |
Posta di Donna | Italian | High (over shoulder) | Powerful cuts, high line defense | Versatile offensive/defensive high guard |
Posta Longa | Italian | Extended (point forward) | Threatening at distance, probing, thrusting | Controls range, initiates engagement |
Tutta Porta di Ferro | Italian | Low-Central (point slightly up) | Strong low/mid line defense, thrusts | Similar to Pflug, very stable |
Posta di Fenestra | Italian | High-Side (point forward) | Thrusts, protects head, lateral defense | "Window" offers view and angles |
Posta di Coda Longa | Italian | Low-Rear (trailing) | Powerful rising cuts, deception | Hides intention, good for surprising attacks |
This table serves as a comparative overview, highlighting the diversity and specific applications of various longsword guards. Remember that these are starting points, and actual application involves fluid transitions and adaptation.
For a dynamic understanding of how these guards are utilized and transitioned between in practice, observing experienced practitioners can be invaluable. The following video offers a beginner-friendly introduction to longsword guards, demonstrating their postures and discussing their applications.
This video, "Learn the Art of Combat: Longsword Guards - Beginners Guide," provides visual examples and explanations that complement the textual descriptions, helping to bring these historical techniques to life. It emphasizes that knowing the guards, understanding which techniques and concepts apply from each, and fluidly transitioning between them are key to effective longsword fencing.
To deepen your understanding of longsword fencing and its intricacies, consider exploring these related topics: