An Investment Committee (IC) Memo is a critical internal document used primarily by venture capital (VC) firms and other investment groups. It serves as a structured analysis and persuasive argument for making an investment, particularly in early-stage startups like those seeking pre-seed funding. While entrepreneurs typically focus on pitch decks, understanding and even drafting an IC memo can provide a significant advantage, as it effectively seeds the narrative that will be discussed by decision-makers.
For pre-seed opportunities, where startups often lack significant revenue or traction, the memo places greater emphasis on the founding team's capabilities, the market potential, the problem being solved, and early signs of validation. It's a narrative-driven, analytical document, typically 1-4 pages, designed to provide a balanced view, including risks and mitigation strategies, to facilitate an informed investment decision.
While the exact format can vary between firms, a comprehensive pre-seed IC memo generally includes the following sections. Remember to tailor the depth of each section to the pre-seed context, where concrete data might be limited.
An investment committee deliberating, similar to the audience for your memo.
This is your hook. Provide a concise (1-2 paragraphs) overview of the entire opportunity. Include the startup's name, what it does, the problem it solves, the founding team's core strength, the funding amount sought (the "ask"), and the key reasons why this is a compelling pre-seed investment. Briefly mention the target valuation range (keeping in mind current market trends, e.g., 2025 averages around $5.3M-$5.7M median/average pre-money valuation for pre-seed deals).
Detail the startup's mission, vision, and the specific product or service being developed. Crucially for pre-seed, dedicate significant space to the founding team. Highlight their relevant experience, past successes (even small ones), domain expertise, and why they are uniquely positioned to solve the identified problem. Mention key advisors if applicable. Briefly touch upon the current stage (e.g., idea, prototype, early beta).
Clearly articulate the specific pain point or inefficiency your startup addresses. Explain why this problem is significant, who experiences it, and why existing solutions are inadequate. Provide context on the market situation that makes this problem particularly relevant now.
Describe your product or service and how it directly solves the problem outlined above. Explain your Unique Value Proposition (UVP) – what makes your solution fundamentally better, faster, cheaper, or different? Detail any core technology or innovative approach that provides a competitive advantage, even at this early stage.
Analyze the target market. Estimate the Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM), even if preliminary. Use credible sources for market size and growth projections. Discuss key market trends supporting the opportunity. Briefly analyze the competitive landscape, identifying major players and explaining your differentiation strategy.
Visualizing the formal setting where investment decisions are often finalized.
Outline your proposed plan for generating revenue (e.g., subscription, freemium, transaction fees). Even if pre-revenue, explain the logic behind your chosen model and pricing strategy. Briefly touch upon the expected cost structure (major expense categories like R&D, future hires, marketing).
For pre-seed, "traction" might not mean revenue. Highlight *any* form of validation: positive feedback from potential users, prototype testing results, pilot programs, waitlist sign-ups, key partnerships formed, significant product development progress, or even strong founder commitment (e.g., personal investment). Outline the key milestones you plan to achieve with the requested funding and the associated timeline (e.g., launching MVP, securing first 10 customers, key hire).
Keep this section lean for pre-seed. Include basic projections (e.g., 1-3 years), estimated burn rate, and runway expected with the new funding. Briefly explain the basis for your valuation expectation (e.g., comparable pre-seed deals, team strength, market size). Acknowledge the high degree of uncertainty but demonstrate thoughtful financial planning.
This section synthesizes *why* this specific investment makes sense for the fund *now*. Connect the startup's potential to the fund's investment strategy and market trends. Reiterate the core strengths (e.g., exceptional team, large untapped market, disruptive tech). Explicitly state the rationale for believing this pre-seed investment can yield significant returns.
Be transparent about potential risks. Common pre-seed risks include product-market fit uncertainty, execution challenges, team gaps, market adoption speed, and competitive responses. For each identified risk, propose concrete mitigation strategies or explain how the team plans to navigate these challenges. This demonstrates foresight and preparedness.
Clearly state the exact amount of pre-seed funding being sought. Provide a specific breakdown of how these funds will be allocated (e.g., % for product development, % for hiring, % for marketing/sales, % for operational costs). Link the use of funds directly to achieving the milestones outlined earlier.
Outline the suggested deal structure (e.g., SAFE note, convertible note - common for pre-seed, or priced equity round). Mention the proposed valuation cap and discount rate if applicable for notes, or the pre-money valuation for an equity round. Specify any key terms discussed, such as board seats or pro-rata rights, though pre-seed terms are often standard.
Briefly summarize the opportunity and reiterate the recommendation (usually to approve the investment, pending final due diligence). End with a clear call to action for the investment committee.
Evaluating a pre-seed opportunity involves weighing several qualitative and quantitative factors. Since concrete metrics are often scarce, investors rely heavily on potential and team strength. This radar chart illustrates a hypothetical assessment of a promising pre-seed startup across key dimensions. Higher scores indicate greater strength or potential in that area relative to typical pre-seed expectations.
In this example, the startup scores highly on 'Team Strength' and 'Problem Significance', common drivers for pre-seed investment. 'Early Validation' is lower, as expected at this stage, but the potential for 'Scalability' and 'Solution Innovation' are promising. The memo should elaborate on the reasoning behind these assessments.
This mindmap provides a visual overview of the essential sections discussed above, helping you organize the information flow for your Investment Committee Memo.
The content and emphasis of an IC memo evolve as a startup matures. While the core structure might remain similar, the focus shifts from potential to proven performance. This table highlights key differences:
Memo Section | Pre-Seed / Seed Focus | Series A / B Focus |
---|---|---|
Team | Founder potential, relevant experience, vision, adaptability. (Often the primary investment driver) | Proven execution ability, completeness of management team, ability to scale organization. |
Market | Large potential market size, validation of problem significance. | Demonstrated market penetration, understanding of specific customer segments, competitive positioning. |
Product | Vision, prototype/MVP, innovative concept, core technology. | Product-market fit evidence, user engagement metrics, product roadmap, defensibility. |
Traction | Early validation (pilots, user feedback, waitlists), qualitative signals. | Quantitative metrics (revenue growth, user growth, churn, unit economics), clear KPIs demonstrating scalability. |
Financials | Basic projections, burn rate, use of funds for key milestones. | Detailed historical financials, robust projections, unit economics analysis, path to profitability. |
Risks | Product-market fit, execution, initial market adoption. | Scaling challenges, competition, market saturation, retaining talent. |
To write an effective memo, it helps to understand how Venture Capitalists (VCs) approach due diligence and what they look for when documenting their findings for the investment committee. This video provides insights into the VC due diligence process and the role of the investment memo from an investor's standpoint.
Watching this can help you anticipate the questions and analyses your potential investors will undertake. The investment memo is essentially the culmination of this diligence process, summarizing the findings and forming the basis for the final investment decision. Understanding this context allows you to proactively address potential concerns and highlight strengths in your own documentation or communication.
While distinct from a pitch deck, structuring your memo requires similar clarity and focus, often aided by templates.
A Pitch Deck is a visual presentation (usually slides) created by the startup for potential investors, designed to generate interest and tell a high-level story. An IC Memo is typically an internal, text-based document written *by* the investment team *for* their investment committee. It's more analytical, details due diligence findings, includes risk assessments, and serves as the formal justification for the investment decision. While a startup might draft a memo to help VCs, the final memo presented to the committee is usually authored by the VC firm itself.
Pre-seed IC memos are generally concise, often ranging from 1 to 4 pages. The goal is to be comprehensive yet easily digestible for the committee members. Focus on conveying the essential information and the core investment thesis without unnecessary jargon or excessive detail, especially given the limited data typical at the pre-seed stage.
While the final IC Memo is usually an internal VC document, it can be highly advantageous for founders to draft one. It forces rigorous thinking about the business from an investor's perspective, helps organize the narrative, and can significantly streamline the VC's internal process by providing a structured summary of key information. Some platforms (like NFX FAST) even use founder-submitted memos as part of their application process.
Common mistakes include:
1) Overly optimistic or unrealistic financial projections.
2) Insufficient focus on the team's strengths and relevant experience.
3) Vague problem/solution descriptions.
4) Ignoring or downplaying significant risks.
5) Lack of clarity on the use of funds and achievable milestones.
6) Poor market analysis or unsubstantiated claims about market size.
7) Being too long or poorly structured, making it hard for the committee to grasp the key points quickly.