The Renault Clio, a stalwart in the supermini segment, has seen considerable evolution, with the 2016-2019 models representing a facelifted fourth generation. While praised for its style and driving dynamics, prospective buyers often question the reliability of its automatic transmission versions. This review synthesizes owner feedback, expert analyses, and common reported issues to provide a comprehensive understanding of what to expect.
The Renault Clio from this era, particularly models equipped with the EDC (Efficient Dual Clutch) automatic transmission, presents a mixed bag when it comes to reliability. While offering a stylish and often economical driving experience, certain mechanical and electrical aspects warrant careful consideration.
A 2016 Renault Clio Dynamique Nav, representative of the model generation under review.
General reliability ratings for the Renault Clio (2013-2019 generation, including the 2016 facelift) tend to be moderate. Some sources cite an overall reliability score of around 82%, which is decent but indicates that problems are not uncommon. In owner satisfaction surveys, such as the 2017 Driver Power survey, approximately 13.3% of Clio owners reported experiencing at least one problem. While Renault as a brand has shown improvement in reliability rankings in more recent years, historically it has placed in the mid-to-lower tiers. The Clio itself often performs reasonably within the small car class, but it's not typically lauded as a leader in fault-free ownership.
The automatic transmission is the most frequently cited area of concern for these Clio models. Issues can range from drivability quirks to more significant mechanical faults.
Many owners and reviewers note that the automatic gearbox, particularly the dual-clutch (EDC) transmission, can be slow to respond, especially during hard acceleration or when quick downshifts are needed for overtaking. This lag can be frustrating in daily driving. It's not uncommon for drivers to experience jerky or hesitant gear changes, particularly at low speeds or from a standstill. Furthermore, the dreaded "Check Auto Gearbox" warning message on the dashboard is a reported issue, sometimes indicating problems with the Transmission Control Module (TCM), mechatronics unit, or internal clutch wear.
Older Renault automatic transmissions, like the DP0 (also known as AL4), which might be relevant contextually or for some earlier iterations influencing perceptions, were known for harsh gear changes, loud banging sounds, and occasionally entering "limp mode" (stuck in one gear, often 3rd). While the EDC is a different system, some similar symptoms like erratic behavior or failure to engage gears have been reported by owners of the 2016-2019 models. Repair costs for automatic gearbox issues can be substantial, with some estimates ranging from around £1,200 to over £1,500, making an extended warranty a consideration for peace of mind.
Aside from the transmission, other areas have drawn owner complaints:
Electrical faults are among the more common non-gearbox related problems. These can include issues with the infotainment system (touchscreen glitches or unresponsiveness), electric windows, and sensors. While often not immobilizing, these faults can be annoying and sometimes costly to rectify.
Suspension components can be a source of problems, leading to noises or a less comfortable ride over time. In terms of interior build quality, some owners have reported rattles developing, particularly in sportier RS models which have a firmer suspension. HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) vents have been noted as somewhat fragile, with flaps prone to breaking as the plastic ages.
The interior of a later model Clio, illustrating the central touchscreen which can be a source of electrical issues.
A peculiar and potentially problematic issue reported by some owners is an unreliable fuel gauge. It might show the fuel level correctly down to half a tank, then pause, failing to update as fuel is consumed, only dropping to empty when the car is about to or has already run out of fuel. This can lead to drivers being unexpectedly stranded.
It's important for potential buyers to check if any recall work pertinent to a specific vehicle has been completed. Some notable recalls or service actions include:
A comprehensive service history is vital. Regular maintenance, adhering to Renault's schedule, particularly for automatic transmission fluid changes (if applicable and recommended for the specific gearbox type), can help prevent or mitigate some of the common issues. Neglecting maintenance can exacerbate wear and lead to more expensive repairs down the line.
To provide a clearer picture of how the 2016-2019 Renault Clio automatic stacks up in key reliability areas, the radar chart below offers an illustrative comparison against what might be considered an "average supermini" in its class. These values are based on synthesized owner feedback and general automotive reliability trends rather than precise statistical data, aiming to highlight areas of relative strength and weakness.
This chart suggests that while the Clio might offer reasonable running costs (excluding major unforeseen repairs) and acceptable interior quality for its class, its automatic gearbox and potentially electrical systems could be areas where it underperforms compared to an average competitor. Owner satisfaction appears moderate, reflecting the mixed experiences.
The mindmap below outlines the key aspects related to the reliability of the 2016-2019 Renault Clio automatic, categorizing common issues, positive attributes, and crucial considerations for potential buyers.
This mindmap serves as a quick visual guide to the multifaceted nature of the Clio automatic's reliability, emphasizing the importance of due diligence before purchase.
Hearing directly about common problems can be invaluable. The following video discusses reliability issues and common faults found in the fourth-generation Renault Clio, which includes the 2016-2019 models. It provides context on what potential owners might encounter.
Video discussing common problems and reliability of the used Renault Clio 4th generation (2012-2019).
This type of owner-driven content and expert summary can highlight recurring themes and real-world experiences that go beyond simple reliability statistics.
When considering a used supermini, it's helpful to see how the Clio automatic might compare to some of its main rivals. The table below offers a qualitative comparison based on general sentiment and reported issues for models from a similar era.
Feature | Renault Clio Auto (2016-2019) | Ford Fiesta Auto (Powershift - similar era) | Volkswagen Polo Auto (DSG - similar era) |
---|---|---|---|
Automatic Gearbox Reliability | Mixed; concerns over EDC responsiveness and longevity. | Mixed; Powershift had notable reliability concerns for some model years. | Generally better, but DSG can be costly if issues arise; smoother operation often cited. |
Electrical System Issues | Moderate frequency reported. | Less frequently a major complaint, but can occur. | Can occur, infotainment sometimes problematic. |
Interior Build Quality | Improved in facelift, but some fragile parts; can feel less premium than some rivals. | Generally solid, though plastics can feel hard in places. | Often considered a benchmark for perceived quality in the class. |
Typical Repair Costs (Qualitative) | Gearbox repairs can be expensive; parts generally reasonable. | Powershift repairs can be very expensive. | DSG repairs can be expensive; general parts slightly higher. |
Overall Owner Satisfaction | Mixed; varies greatly depending on individual car's history. | Mixed, heavily influenced by Powershift experiences. | Generally good, but not immune to problems. |
This table provides a generalized comparison. Individual vehicle condition and history are paramount.
Several factors play a significant role in how reliable a 2016-2019 Renault Clio automatic will be over time:
The 2016-2019 Renault Clio automatic can be a stylish and enjoyable supermini, but its reliability, particularly concerning the automatic transmission, is a point of caution. While many owners may have positive experiences, the prevalence of reported gearbox issues, electrical gremlins, and other minor faults means that prospective buyers should approach with diligence. A comprehensive pre-purchase inspection, a thorough check of the service history (especially for transmission servicing), and a careful test drive focusing on gearbox behavior are essential. If a well-maintained example is found, and the buyer is aware of the potential risks, it can still be a viable option. However, for those prioritizing a consistently trouble-free automatic experience, some competitors might offer greater peace of mind.