The results section is dedicated to presenting your research findings as accurately and objectively as possible. It is important to bear in mind that this section is solely about reporting what was observed—interpretations are reserved for the discussion section. This part of your paper should detail and display the data collected in a structured manner.
The main objectives are:
Think of the results section as a detailed presentation of your numerical and qualitative findings. Ensure each table or figure is properly labeled and referenced in your text. Avoid commentary or interpretation in this section to maintain objectivity.
Using visual representations of your data enhances clarity and supports the reader’s understanding. Consider these elements:
| Data Element | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Tables | Display structured numerical data, summary statistics. | Mean, standard deviation, confidence intervals |
| Charts/Graphs | Visualize trends, group comparisons, correlations. | Bar graphs, scatter plots, histograms |
| Figures | Include images or schematic diagrams that complement the data. | Flowcharts, models of processes |
Ensure each of these elements is accompanied by a concise written explanation that provides context. Remember that clarity is key—we present the facts and let later sections interpret them.
The discussion section is your opportunity to interpret your results and explain their significance. Here, you transition from mere reporting to analyzing what your data implies in the broader context of your research domain.
This section should:
Begin by summarizing the key outcomes of your research. Explain what the data suggest in the context of your original hypotheses or research questions. For instance, if a significant correlation was discovered between variables, discuss why this might be the case and how it compares with previous studies.
Use comparative language to relate your findings to existing studies. This may include statements like:
A critical aspect of the discussion is acknowledging the limitations of your study. It is important to be upfront about potential biases, the scope of your sample, or any other methodological constraints that might influence your results. For example, you might note:
"While our study demonstrates a significant trend, the reliance on self-reported measures may impact the objectivity of these results. Future research should include more robust, objective measurements to validate these findings."
Discuss the potential implications of your study in practical, theoretical, or methodological terms. What does your research add to the current body of knowledge? How might these results affect policies, practices, or future investigations? Recommendations might include:
Frame your future research suggestions not as weaknesses, but as natural continuations of the scholarly inquiry. For example:
"Future studies could explore the underlying mechanisms behind these associations using a larger and more diverse sample, or they might incorporate a longitudinal design to capture trends over time."
Combining the two sections into a cohesive narrative is crucial for effective academic writing. Consider the following structure as a template:
| Section | Content | Key Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Results |
Present comprehensive data with minimal interpretation.
|
Objectivity, clarity, factual data |
| Discussion |
Interpret and analyze your findings.
|
Context, analysis, critical reflection |
This unified structure not only enhances readability but also ensures a logical sequence that guides the reader from an objective presentation of data to a comprehensive analysis of its implications.
Both results and discussion sections are key to a well-rounded research paper. Consider these best practices:
• Ensure that every data point and statistical value in the results section is clearly presented and easy to understand. • Avoid ambiguity by using precise language that strictly adheres to the data.
• Sequence your content so that each section naturally flows into the next. • Start with a clear presentation of results, then transition into detailed discussion and analysis.
• Use visual aids not only to break up text but also to emphasize key findings. • Cross-reference these figures within both the results and discussion sections to enhance cohesion.
• Self-critical evaluation in the discussion section builds credibility. • Clearly articulate any potential weaknesses in methodology, and discuss how these may affect your interpretations.
This balanced approach of objectively presenting the data and then thoughtfully analyzing it forms the essence of an effective research paper. Remember, the results section provides a factual basis, while the discussion offers your interpretation, contextual evaluation, and recommendations for broader research implications.
Before finalizing your paper, consider these additional suggestions: