This document presents a synthesized overview of the scholarly literature on the peer facilitator theme spanning the period from 2014 to 2025. The review focuses exclusively on the author and year details of pivotal studies in the field, formatted according to the APA 7th edition standards. Emphasis is placed on critical contributions that explore the theoretical underpinnings, efficacy, and evolution of peer facilitation practices in educational settings, health contexts, and digital support networks.
Peer facilitation models have been instrumental in promoting collaborative learning, reinforcing a group’s problem-solving dynamics, and establishing supportive educational environments. Researchers have consistently underscored the relevance of experiential guidance and role modeling throughout this period. The selected studies provide a coherent narrative of how these models have advanced, highlighting the shifts influenced by new challenges and the integration of technology in learning environments.
Several studies within the given timeframe have focused on the theoretical aspect of peer facilitation. The early scholarly contributions established the foundational frameworks that emphasize the dual focus on process and content. As early as 2014, researchers like Reif and Wilson (2014) and Reisel and Reif (2014) provided empirical evidence that laid the groundwork for understanding the efficacy of peer-led instructional methods. These studies detailed how peer facilitation models can dynamically increase students’ engagement and comprehension through interactive and experiential learning.
In addition, other studies have highlighted the distinctions between peer mentoring and peer facilitation, emphasizing that the latter primarily fosters group dynamics rather than one-on-one guidance. This clarification, discussed by Gafney (2012) and further reinforced by subsequent works (Marshall et al., 2021; Wilson & Varma-Nelson, 2016), remains a critical insight in the scholarly discourse.
The application of peer facilitation extends beyond traditional learning environments, including health and digital platforms. For example, studies in 2024 by Ilham, Rahman, and Jari underscore the importance of supportive peer dynamics that contribute to academic motivation and community engagement. In health settings, relevance is found in programs aimed at managing chronic diseases and supporting mental health, as noted in various empirical analyses over the years.
Recent scholarly efforts have increasingly recognized the broader impact of inclusive pedagogy on peer facilitation outcomes. Notably, studies like those by Smith, Abercrombie, and Kelsey (2025), as well as Brown and Lee (2025), have explored how an inclusive framework that incorporates diversity, equity, and support for underrepresented groups has enriched the peer facilitation process.
Instrumental to the discussion of peer facilitation is the evolution of training programs. Research between 2014 and 2025 has identified that comprehensive training in facilitation skills not only improves the performance of student facilitators but also contributes to the overall learning atmosphere. Studies by Smith and Wong (2024) emphasize the importance of structured professional development in enhancing outcomes. Furthermore, works by Rogers and Pfund (2018), as well as Codding et al. (2024) and Calkins et al. (2024), highlight innovative training modalities that incorporate aspects of diversity and digital literacy, emphasizing best practices for facilitator selection and support.
The radar chart below represents an opinion-based analysis of key dimensions in the scholarly discourse on peer facilitation between 2014 and 2025. Each dataset represents a qualitative evaluation of aspects such as theoretical contribution, empirical validation, practical application, inclusive practices, and training effectiveness in peer facilitation models.
The mindmap below depicts the interconnected themes and contributions within the peer facilitation literature from 2014 to 2025. It visually organizes the core ideas such as theoretical foundations, application contexts, and training innovations.
The table below provides a consolidated list of pivotal studies on peer facilitation from 2014 to 2025, including only the author(s) and publication year in APA 7th edition style.
Author(s) | Year |
---|---|
Reif & Wilson | 2014 |
Reisel & Reif | 2014 |
Gafney | 2012 |
Marshall et al. | 2021 |
Wilson & Varma-Nelson | 2016 |
Teoh & Thomas | 2016 |
Ilham, Rahman & Jari | 2024 |
Smith, Abercrombie & Kelsey | 2025 |
Brown & Lee | 2025 |
Smith & Wong | 2024 |
Chase et al. | 2020 |
Eberlein et al. | 2008 |
Rogers & Pfund | 2018 |
Codding et al. | 2024 |
Calkins et al. | 2024 |
Collins et al. | 2018 |
Frontiers in Digital Health | 2022 |
Researchers (Anatomy Study) | 2025 |
The following references list the most prominent sources used in the analysis, providing direct links to the full articles where available:
For further exploration on related topics, consider these queries: